diglloyd
VIEW CATALOG

Our Publications:


Outstanding 6G SSD Performance!

Lloyd's recommendations for:
SSDHard drivesMemory
from trusted vendor OWC

For reviews, visit:
Mac Performance Guide


100% Kona, 100% Family Owned
Don't miss Mac Performance Guide.com
Wind in My Face Bicycling blog and gear reviews
toggle color scheme

Thursday, May 27, 2010

Do filters degrade image quality or do they have no effect?

Do filters degrade image quality or do they have no effect?
Click for more...

Yes.

I just ordered some filters, one to put onto a very fine lens.

Today I was asked (yet again) whether filters degrade image quality. Of course they do, and no they don’t!

Regrettably, I own perhaps 150 filters, accumulated over the years in a dozen sizes and colors and functions, many from film days for color balance reasons. I wish I had my money back for most of them, because I rarely use them any more.

Some popular brands alter color balance in undesirable ways, killing off deep blues (for example). To me, this is unacceptable with today’s fantastic DSLRs, just as it was with film.

From what I have concluded over the years both in general use and with some tests:

  • Buy only the best filters, like B+W MRC (MRC is scratch resistant, a worthwhile feature);
  • Buy only truly neutral UV filters (eg B+W MRC);
  • Some popular brands have “neutral” filters that alter color balance in undesirable ways, killing off deep blues (for example);
  • Keep them spotless;
  • They are needed only for lens protection (specialty filters such as a polarizer are an exception). Sand, dirt, salt spray, heavy pollution, rain, peanut butter fingers, etc.

That’s my take. Skip ’em otherwise, and don’t skimp if you get one.

For more on filters and spectral transmission, read this.

diglloyd Inc. | FTC Disclosure | Privacy Policy | Trademarks | Terms of Use | Copyright © 2008-2012 diglloyd Inc, all rights reserved. | Contact