diglloyd
VIEW CATALOG

Our Publications:


Two Drives in Your Mac Laptop!

Lloyd's recommendations for:
SSDHard drivesMemory
from trusted vendor OWC

For reviews, visit:
Mac Performance Guide


100% Kona, 100% Family Owned
Don't miss Mac Performance Guide.com
Wind in My Face Bicycling blog and gear reviews
toggle color scheme

Sunday, May 13, 2007

Why digital point and shoot cameras are “all shit”

The May 12 entry How To Choose a Digital Point-and-Shoot at The Online Photographer is excellent, and a must-read for anyone considering a digital point and shoot camera.

My only regret is that I didn’t write the article, because it’s oh-so-true—I’ve owned about 8 digital point and shoot cameras now, after researching carefully, and guess what? They all suck. The only reason I have them is to be able to fit one in a cycling jersey pocket or pants pocket. Perhaps when the self-defeating race to cram ever more more megapixels into ever-tinier sensors is over (shortly after hell freezes over), camera manufacturers will realize that all we need to make beautiful 13X19 prints is 3 to 5 high quality megapixels, not 7, 8 or 10 noisy and blurry ones. Oh, and one must be able to actually take the picture—so that 1/2 second shutter delay has got to be engineered out. And the focusing hunting, etc.

The reason to waste $250 - $400 on a point-and-shoot Crap Camera boils down to convenience. For me, this means a pleasing high resolution screen (since that’s what I must shoot with), and a form factor that won’t dissuade me from carrying the dang thing. The $540 Nikon D40x (including 18-55 zoom) is a vastly superior camera, and it works far better as a point-and-shoot than a point-and-shoot Crap Camera does! (though without a rear live-view screen). Ditto for the Canon Digital Rebel XT.

After trying many models over the past several years, I’ve settled on the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX30 (about $280x) and its slightly larger sibling, the Lumix DMC-FX50 (about $300x) which sports a 3" display instead of a 2.5" display. I’ve had the predecessor FX10 and FX01 models also, the FX30 and FX50 are the best current choices. Both models look great in black; I’ve gotten a number of compliments and queries about them. You can also pay another $200 or so to change the letters “Panasonic” to read “Leica” (though Leica claims to “cherry pick” the best units, and also offers a longer warranty).

Note that Panasonic’s model lineup display is designed by morons; it appears that there are dozens of choices when in fact most are just variants of the camera body color. A letter such as “K”, “A”, “S”, etc is appended to the model (eg FX50K) to indicate the body color.

diglloyd Inc. | FTC Disclosure | Privacy Policy | Trademarks | Terms of Use | Copyright © 2008-2012 diglloyd Inc, all rights reserved. | Contact