diglloyd
VIEW CATALOG

Our Publications:


Outstanding 6G SSD Performance!

Lloyd's recommendations for:
SSDHard drivesMemory
from trusted vendor OWC

For reviews, visit:
Mac Performance Guide


100% Kona, 100% Family Owned
Don't miss Mac Performance Guide.com
Wind in My Face Bicycling blog and gear reviews
toggle color scheme

Sunday, March 04, 2007

Severe FireWire performance bug on Mac Pro

As I explained in my Feb 28 blog entry, I reserve internal drives for a striped RAID array containing data only (no system software or applications). I boot the Mac Pro from a FireWire 800 drive on which I’ve installed Mac OS X, plugged into the FireWire 800 port on the rear of the machine.

To my puzzlement, I had observed poor performance on the boot drive while copying files, and now I’ve determined the cause. Below are the performance numbers from DiskTester on a partly-full boot drive ('disktester run-sequential -c 128M Boot', speed would be a bit faster on an empty drive):

Write rate: 63.0MB/sec
Read rate:  69.4MB/sec

Plug in any of the following peripherals (it doesn’t matter whether the peripheral is FireWire 400 or FireWire 800):

  • Epson R2400 printer using a FireWire 400 cable to the front of the Mac Pro (turn printer on after plugging in);
  • Lexar FireWire 400 card reader to the Cinema Display port;
  • SanDisk FireWire 800 card reader to the front of the Mac Pro. (Yes, FireWire 800).
  • A 2nd FireWire 800 hard drive, connected to the first one, or directly to the Mac Pro.

Testing again with DiskTester yields the following greatly-impaired performance figures:

Write rate: 23.4MB/sec
Read rate:  51.2MB/sec

I verified this multiple times, plugging and unplugging with the same results every timewrite speed is cut to nearly 1/3 of the speed without the peripheral! Read speed drops by 26%. While disappointing, one might expect that plugging in a FireWire 400 peripheral would cut performance to FireWire 400 speeds, but plugging in a FireWire 800 peripheral ought to have no effect!

The PowerMac G5 line suffered from a broken implementation of FireWire with impaired write performance (see various benchmarks at barefeats.com). These results show that the fancy new Mac Pro suffers similar problem—FireWire is worthless as a means of extending storage capacity when performance is a goal, should you want to connect even a single other peripheral.

What good are additional FireWire ports if connecting more than one device of any kind kills hard disk performance?

Note that connecting a 2nd FireWire 800 hard drive produces the same impaired performance. Don’t be suckered into using FireWire 800 for RAID, or any other multi-drive setup unless these low levels of performance are acceptable.

diglloyd Inc. | FTC Disclosure | Privacy Policy | Trademarks | Terms of Use | Copyright © 2008-2012 diglloyd Inc, all rights reserved. | Contact