diglloyd
VIEW CATALOG

Our Publications:


Outstanding 6G SSD Performance!

Lloyd's recommendations for:
SSDHard drivesMemory
from trusted vendor OWC

For reviews, visit:
Mac Performance Guide


100% Kona, 100% Family Owned
Don't miss Mac Performance Guide.com
Wind in My Face Bicycling blog and gear reviews
toggle color scheme

Thursday, July 20, 2006

More on infrared hot spots

Yesterday’s discussion of infrared hot spots did not demonstrate the unpredictible nature of infrared flare, which has little regard for the prime versus zoom debate. Consider the two examples below. Contrast is better with a prime lens, right?

100-400-260-f11

300f4L-f11

Wrong! Both examples were taken at f11. The top one was taken with the Canon EF 100-400/f4.5-5.6L IS USM and the bottom one with the Canon EF 300/f4L IS USM. The MTF charts suggest that the prime lens should offer notably better contrast than the zoom overall. However, MTF at the center of the image is better with the zoom (at least at 400mm), and in infrared the prime clearly shows the infrared flare problem seen above. It’s no “small” problem—the letter “A” above is about 1300 pixels wide in the original frame! [Thanks to Keeble & Shucat of Palo Alto, CA for loaning me the lenses for this test—a terrific store if you live in the area].

diglloyd Inc. | FTC Disclosure | Privacy Policy | Trademarks | Terms of Use | Copyright © 2008-2012 diglloyd Inc, all rights reserved. | Contact