Latest or all posts or last 15, 30, 90 or 180 days.
2024-04-24 12:32:34
Designed for the most demanding needs of photographers and videographers.
877-865-7002
Today’s Deal Zone Items... Handpicked deals...
$1999 $998
SAVE $1001

$2499 $1999
SAVE $500

$3898 $3848
SAVE $50

$5999 $4399
SAVE $1600

$3198 $3148
SAVE $50

$999 $999
SAVE $click

$2499 $2099
SAVE $400

$5999 $4399
SAVE $1600

$999 $849
SAVE $150

$1049 $849
SAVE $200

$680 $680
SAVE $click

$300 $300
SAVE $click

$5999 $4399
SAVE $1600

$4499 $3499
SAVE $1000

$999 $999
SAVE $click

$799 $699
SAVE $100

$1199 $899
SAVE $300

More on infrared hot spots

Yesterday’s discussion of infrared hot spots did not demonstrate the unpredictible nature of infrared flare, which has little regard for the prime versus zoom debate. Consider the two examples below. Contrast is better with a prime lens, right?



Wrong! Both examples were taken at f11. The top one was taken with the Canon EF 100-400/f4.5-5.6L IS USM and the bottom one with the Canon EF 300/f4L IS USM. The MTF charts suggest that the prime lens should offer notably better contrast than the zoom overall. However, MTF at the center of the image is better with the zoom (at least at 400mm), and in infrared the prime clearly shows the infrared flare problem seen above. It’s no “small” problem—the letter “A” above is about 1300 pixels wide in the original frame! [Thanks to Keeble & Shucat of Palo Alto, CA for loaning me the lenses for this test—a terrific store if you live in the area].


View all handpicked deals...

FUJIFILM GF 20-35mm f/4 R WR Lens
$2499 $1999
SAVE $500

diglloyd Inc. | FTC Disclosure | PRIVACY POLICY | Trademarks | Terms of Use
Contact | About Lloyd Chambers | Consulting | Photo Tours
RSS Feeds | X.com/diglloyd
Copyright © 2022 diglloyd Inc, all rights reserved.